Machine learning: Difference between revisions
| (46 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iHwuw_UREcvxh5Fh0C-UeefkqOClDOs0Q3LBpEDtPXw/edit?usp=sharing Agenda] | * [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iHwuw_UREcvxh5Fh0C-UeefkqOClDOs0Q3LBpEDtPXw/edit?usp=sharing Agenda] | ||
==Notes documents== | ===Presentations=== | ||
* [[Media:Pl@ntNet_at_iDigBio_phenology_(1).pdf|Alexis Joly]] | |||
* Brian Stucky | |||
* [[Media:White.IDigBio_DL_workshop.pdf|Alex White]] | |||
* Nicky Nicholson | |||
* [[Media:Mazer.iDigBio-Gainesville-011719.compressed.pdf|Susan Mazer]] | |||
* [[Media:Pearson.CAP_DeepLearningWorkshop2.pdf|Katie Pearson]] | |||
* [[Media:Sweeney.Pheno_in_the_Machine_Sweeney_2019.pdf|Patrick Sweeney]] | |||
* [[Media:ImageProcessingPipelineforiDigBioimages.pdf|Renato Figueiredo]] | |||
==Notes documents - Thursday== | |||
'''Round One''' | |||
'''Assignment: Write the thesis paragraph for a paper outlining the major components of the perfect system for acquiring and managing phenological data from plant specimens. Restrict your paragraph to 6 sentences, the topic sentence and 5 supporting sentences addressing the 5 major components your paper will elucidate. Arrange your 5 sentences in priority order.''' | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I2c3SIrQadgf6T1BidevyhmpkKvFOwZLrgutb_iqcjM/edit?usp=sharing Group 1] | * [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I2c3SIrQadgf6T1BidevyhmpkKvFOwZLrgutb_iqcjM/edit?usp=sharing Group 1] | ||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z2KcG2-6OAN3GyhJP_L6wEkpFx-SH3pIv7nnlzajSJs/edit?usp=sharing Group 2] | * [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z2KcG2-6OAN3GyhJP_L6wEkpFx-SH3pIv7nnlzajSJs/edit?usp=sharing Group 2] | ||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A8tYql7cu0aqdpnezu0CPv0ptcSWmAU5tCGqze7BtYU/edit?usp=sharing Group 3] | * [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A8tYql7cu0aqdpnezu0CPv0ptcSWmAU5tCGqze7BtYU/edit?usp=sharing Group 3] | ||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jBx93xJocGaTJogvBzoaEHOw3nw11SuyTQJ0fIhuc74/edit?usp=sharing Group 4] | * [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jBx93xJocGaTJogvBzoaEHOw3nw11SuyTQJ0fIhuc74/edit?usp=sharing Group 4] | ||
* | * [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Be6uP0pfHtO8RIvpqN_Ypwwnleuk2xpOHGEJL3Z-LWM/edit Summary Round 1] | ||
'''Round Two Assignment: ''' | |||
'''From round one, several major topics cut across most of your responses, including standards, scoring, machine learning, Computational power/cyberinfrastructure. Self-select into four groups and outline where we are and where we want to go for these components.''' | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B0TObkmaP0gvbOloS1qZHHcsKWQNDDnTS3zQl1VhY8s/edit?usp=sharing Group 5 - Standards] | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IHgvPDxiVrbyo1bslVZO-jZ-SJPf9RAkfVsBl9ZDgWs/edit?usp=sharing Group 6 - Scoring] | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t2rdY5n5los8mXq3dMtx_Ayx2DJXRTXllASWLKDhg3Q/edit Group 7 - Machine learning] | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GYVeUkp2NtKTJ3FM4u50z0p4tOOtK6SR_H30PFy1dQw/edit?usp=sharing Group 8 - Computational power/cyberinfrastructure] | |||
==Notes documents - Friday== | |||
'''Round Three Assignment: From our discussions on Day 1, record what you recognize as priority issues that need to be addressed first. Think of this in terms of a project. If funds were available to begin a project, what are the critical outcomes the project should strive to achieve?''' | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MfXrXEMmgkgOH2G7Io7Z6kxx1wIpEiZrXV44ive3Lj8/edit?usp=sharing Burning Issues for Friday] | |||
'''Round Four Assignment: Continuing with our project development scenario, self-select the components you are most interested in and in small groups, begin to add implementation steps to our project, thinking as concretely as possible and making a strong and convincing case for the components you envision.''' | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/12FG8KRmVO9J3JrOKtCXPgAWZJwGkI0eq6jBYrIVCqg0/edit?usp=sharing Group 9 - Questions] | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eiQ_ewMoN0CsnR-hWSDOHa83yZD1MI-7WSJKRh-m78c/edit?usp=sharing Group 10 - PPO] | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AI1ox_xrzF_vckcyAXijZ_VBIg3q7Kz0740Xuc3crMA/edit?usp=sharing Group 11 - Adapting tools] | |||
'''Paper Design''' | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M3OIBDUXIYcsHdfKXT1gzTkKCEg2qSqOw1AIt2WpezA/edit?usp=sharing Outline] | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_yBdP1kqCAtOVQggl3fTCwZpXO3eZqidQIwG_KjcfUs/edit?usp=sharing Group 12] | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JK9Y3PohiewRG_Cm7dAAqfsA_OTaGwbwfz58QwMn5io/edit?usp=sharing Group 13] | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ALtkqTx1DqRfa7sEVeJYtVTn7_eSLidBbON_UjzQgzc/edit?usp=sharing Group 14] | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c8c-uup27sXDwBuvXutPr2J7HMf9eThl7Q4qPjeCNL0/edit?usp=sharing Section 4] | |||
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fw8onMSL8kZqlUsnWgsUxb6VSj_M3vVRnOZH86rnr84/edit?usp=sharing Section 5] | |||
==Workshop Participants== | |||
Susan Mazer, University of California, Santa Barbara</p> | |||
<p>Brian Stucky, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida</p> | |||
<p>Katelin "Katie" Pearson, California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo</p> | |||
<p>Alex White, Department of Botany / Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution</p> | |||
<p>Sylvia Orli, Smithsonian</p> | |||
<p>Patrick Sweeney, Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History</p> | |||
<p>Emily Meineke, Harvard University Herbaria</p> | |||
<p>Charles Davis, Harvard University Herbaria</p> | |||
<p>Ellen Denny, USA-NPN/Univ of AZ</p> | |||
<p>Laura Brenskelle, University of Florida</p> | |||
<p>Nadya Williams, University of California, San Diego</p> | |||
<p>Libby Ellwood, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles</p> | |||
<p>Pierre Bonnet, CIRAD</p> | |||
<p>Alexis Joly, Inria</p> | |||
<p>Hervé Goëau, CIRAD</p> | |||
<p>Titouan Lorieul, Inria / University of Montpellier</p> | |||
<p>Nicky Nicolson, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and Dept of Computer Science, Brunel University, London</p> | |||
<p>Katja Seltmann, UC Santa Barbara</p> | |||
<p>Isaac Park, University of California Santa Barbara</p> | |||
<p>Mason Heberling, Carnegie Museum of Natural History</p> | |||
<p>Myla Aronson, Rutgers University</p> | |||
<p>Deborah Paul, Florida State University</p> | |||
<p>Renato Figueiredo, University of Florida</p> | |||
<p>Annika Smith, Florida Museum of Natural History</p> | |||
<p>Pam Soltis, Florida Museum of Natural History</p> | |||
<p>Gil Nelson, Florida Museum of Natural History</p> | |||
Latest revision as of 15:35, 25 January 2020
Phenology Deep Learning Workshop
Presentations
- Alexis Joly
- Brian Stucky
- Alex White
- Nicky Nicholson
- Susan Mazer
- Katie Pearson
- Patrick Sweeney
- Renato Figueiredo
Notes documents - Thursday
Round One Assignment: Write the thesis paragraph for a paper outlining the major components of the perfect system for acquiring and managing phenological data from plant specimens. Restrict your paragraph to 6 sentences, the topic sentence and 5 supporting sentences addressing the 5 major components your paper will elucidate. Arrange your 5 sentences in priority order.
Round Two Assignment: From round one, several major topics cut across most of your responses, including standards, scoring, machine learning, Computational power/cyberinfrastructure. Self-select into four groups and outline where we are and where we want to go for these components.
- Group 5 - Standards
- Group 6 - Scoring
- Group 7 - Machine learning
- Group 8 - Computational power/cyberinfrastructure
Notes documents - Friday
Round Three Assignment: From our discussions on Day 1, record what you recognize as priority issues that need to be addressed first. Think of this in terms of a project. If funds were available to begin a project, what are the critical outcomes the project should strive to achieve?
Round Four Assignment: Continuing with our project development scenario, self-select the components you are most interested in and in small groups, begin to add implementation steps to our project, thinking as concretely as possible and making a strong and convincing case for the components you envision.
Paper Design
Workshop Participants
Susan Mazer, University of California, Santa Barbara
Brian Stucky, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida
Katelin "Katie" Pearson, California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo
Alex White, Department of Botany / Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution
Sylvia Orli, Smithsonian
Patrick Sweeney, Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History
Emily Meineke, Harvard University Herbaria
Charles Davis, Harvard University Herbaria
Ellen Denny, USA-NPN/Univ of AZ
Laura Brenskelle, University of Florida
Nadya Williams, University of California, San Diego
Libby Ellwood, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles
Pierre Bonnet, CIRAD
Alexis Joly, Inria
Hervé Goëau, CIRAD
Titouan Lorieul, Inria / University of Montpellier
Nicky Nicolson, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and Dept of Computer Science, Brunel University, London
Katja Seltmann, UC Santa Barbara
Isaac Park, University of California Santa Barbara
Mason Heberling, Carnegie Museum of Natural History
Myla Aronson, Rutgers University
Deborah Paul, Florida State University
Renato Figueiredo, University of Florida
Annika Smith, Florida Museum of Natural History
Pam Soltis, Florida Museum of Natural History
Gil Nelson, Florida Museum of Natural History