946
edits
Data Problems: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
#This is also the place to document portal interaction difficulties. | #This is also the place to document portal interaction difficulties. | ||
iDigBio interest groups are aware of this documentation and feed it back to their respective groups. Progress and feedback from the developers is also noted here. | |||
Another useful feature to take note of are iDigBio's data flags - common data quality issues and data corrections that may be performed on recordsets to improve the capabilities of iDigBio Search (see https://github.com/iDigBio/idigbio-search-api/wiki/Data-Quality-Flags). Data quality flags are identified for each of the ingested recordsets on their respective portal webpage.<br> | |||
===User Anecdotes=== | ===User Anecdotes=== | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1" | {| class="wikitable sortable" border="1" | ||
| Line 52: | Line 55: | ||
|valign="top"| R. Rabeler, TTD TCN (2/2015) https://www.idigbio.org/redmine/issues/1396 | |valign="top"| R. Rabeler, TTD TCN (2/2015) https://www.idigbio.org/redmine/issues/1396 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|valign="top"| | |||
Database Search resulted in a rich specimen record dataset (in this case for lichens and bryophytes) for a participant at the IPT workshop. The researcher wants only the distinct taxon names (and count of speicmens per distinct taxon name). The researcher describes that downloading the dataset is then followed by "a lot of work" to get the distinct list of taxon names to share with a colleague. | |||
* How do we link to instructions for how to do this sort of task either a) through our existing UI if possible, or b) to an API example. In this use case, Alex and Matt verified it is possible already, to do this (sort of) through our existing API. | |||
|valign="top"|Mac Alford, (2015), entered here by Deb. | |||
|- | |||
|valign="top"|Collections - It would be great if collections could get a sense of their collections uniqueness – what do they have in their collections that no other collection in the portal has – either taxonomically or geographically. It would be great if you could get a uniqueness factor and display a summary of the unique aspects of the collection. Maybe even include preparation information – do I have tissues that nobody else has of a particular species or from a particular area? This would be very handy in grant proposals and in justifying the existence of particularly small collections. | |||
|valign="top"| Andy Bentley (3/2015) | |||
|- | |||
|valign="top"|Researchers – It would be very handy if researchers could subscribe to a portal in order to get an alert when specimens of target species or geographic regions are added to the portal. For research purposes, this would alert them to new material that may warrant their inspection and would facilitate loan traffic from collections that have newly catalog material. | |||
|valign="top"| Andy Bentley (3/2015) | |||
|} | |} | ||