IDigBio Retreat 2016: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
(Undo revision 21570 by Djennings (talk))
No edit summary
Line 50: Line 50:
|-
|-
|9:00 - 12:00
|9:00 - 12:00
|Morning Session
|'''Morning Session'''
Concentrate on our priorities for the next five years. What should stay the same, what should stop or change, what will put us where we want to be in 2021 – the end of the 10-year support from NSF?  What is most important for us to concentrate on, and why?
* What do we want iDigBio to look like in 2021?
* What does the collections community expect from us in the next five years?
* What does the biodiversity research community expect from us in the next five years?
* What does the bioinformatics community expect from us in the next five years?
* Do we continue the annual Summit in its current format, or should we have a smaller annual meeting directed at new TCNs — perhaps with the Natural Science Collections      Alliance (NSCA) taking over the Summit as an annual meeting?
* Should our search portal go away and instead make all data being accessible through GBIF by 2021?
|-
|-
|12:00 - 1:00
|12:00 - 1:00
Line 56: Line 63:
|-
|-
|1:00 - 4:00
|1:00 - 4:00
|Afternoon Session
|'''Afternoon Session'''
Translate our vision for the next five years into objectives/milestones.
* Do we need to change our mission, vision, and horizon statements?
* Do we need to change our scope inclusions and exclusions?
* What do we want to achieve and when?
* What are each person's roles and responsibilities?
* What steps should we take to move towards sustainability and on what timeline?
|-
|-
|4:00
|4:00

Navigation menu